Hivatalos oldal | Magyar rajongói oldal | Fontos infók kezdőknek!| Tutoriálok | GYIK | War Thunder: Air Forces topikA másokkal való személyeskedés, a provokálás, kötekedés, illetve az alpári nyelvezet, káromkodás a fórumon nem megengedett, ezért külön figyelmeztetés nélkül büntetőpontokkal, bannal jutalmazzuk!
-
Valka78 #32075 Abban az összefoglaló leírásban olvastam ezeket, bemásolok néhány idézetet, hátha elkerülték a figyelmedet:
"However the quality of Soviet optics combined with the limited visibility from inside the tank affected combat performance. A German unit that used the T-34/76 model ’43 in combat noted (9):
‘The gun sights in Russian tanks are far behind the German designs. The German gunners need to be thoroughly accustomed to the Russian telescopic gunsights. The ability to spot a hit through the gunsight is very limited.’
"
".....Soviet tank guns suffered from low velocity leading to poor penetration and accuracy at long ranges.
For example the initial round velocity (m/s) for the Soviet guns (7) (using the standard A/T round) was: L-11 - 612, F-34 - 655 (a German test with Pzgr39 ammo showed 625), ZiS S-53 - 792. The comparable German stats (8) were: KwK 38 L/42 - 685, Kwk 39 L/60 - 835, Kwk 40 L/43 - 740, Kwk 40 L/48 - 790, Kwk 42 – 925.
The KwK 40 75mm used by the Pz IV and Stug from mid 1942 had far better penetration performance and accuracy than the F-34 and the Panther’s KwK 42 was also superior to the ZiS S-53 85mm in the same areas."
Ezekhez még hozzájárult a szűk hely, a kicsi 'gun depression' és hogy a lövész szerepét is a parancsnoknak kellett betölteni. Valahol olvastam az ágyú gyors túlmelegedéséről és pontatlanságáról is, de most nem találom. Valamint, hogy a legénység döbbenetes képzetlensége virtuális harcot folytatott a moralitásukkal arról; ki foglaljon mélyebben helyet a béka segge alatt. Ez sem elhanyagolható szempont szerintem, habár nem technikai jellegű.
Még néhány érdekesség, ami nem egészen úgy van wt-ben, ahogy itt írják:
"From mid 1942 the PzIV was equipped with the longer 75mm gun KwK 40 that could destroy the T-34 from 1.000m.)
The upgraded PzIV was superior to the T-34 in internal layout, firepower, turret basket, optics, commander’s cupola, radio in every vehicle and its frontal hull armor could withstand the F-34 rounds. A Soviet study in 1943 (27) admitted that the Pz IV was superior to their tank, assigning it a combat value of 1.27 to the T-34’s 1.16 (with the Pz III being the base 1.0)."
"By summer ’42 it made up 51% of German tank strength. At that time it had received a longer 50mm gun that could destroy the T-34 from 500m frontally (with special ammunition). It also received more basic armor (50mm from 30mm) plus 20mm bolted on parts. The extra armor negated the performance of the F-34 at long ranges."
Ez utóbbi idézet gyakorlatilag a pzIII M lehet, ami wt-ben 10 méterről sem lövi át szemből a T-34-et, nemhogy 500m-ről.
Végül egy kis összefoglaló:
"If the T-34 was as good as propaganda made it out to be then it should have led to great Soviet victories in 1941-42. Instead what we see in that period is the poor performance of Soviet armored formations. In 1943-45 the T-34 was becoming outdated as the Germans used updated versions of the Pz IV and Stug III equipped with the powerful Kwk 40 75mm gun and of course they introduced the Tiger and Panther.
"The T-34 had limited internal space due to the sloped armor in the front, the sides and the back of the vehicle. There were fuel tanks in the engine compartment and at the sides of the hull. The presence of fuel tanks inside the fighting compartment made any penetration of the tank likely to lead to the complete loss of the vehicle."
The ‘best tank of WWII’ suffered horrific losses against those tanks and even the updated version T-34/85 could not bridge the gap. According to a Soviet report (29) in the period summer 1943 - March 1945 the probability of the T-34’s armor being penetrated if hit was from 88-97%, thus any round that managed to hit the tank was practically certain to penetrate the armor."
Utoljára szerkesztette: Valka78, 2016.09.16. 12:51:25