A 'láthatósági / álcázási rendszer' magyarázataLegfrissebb MM táblázat Képfeltöltés ittReplay feltöltés ittOnline Tech-Tree Virtuális pénisz mérő (EFF/WN7)Serious Threat StreamMr Scheff Stream[FAQ - GYIK avagy Gyakran Ismételt Kérdések]Individuális missziók listája TeamSpeak: pointer4.no-ip.org, jelszó nincs
-
lexlutor #367908 goldammo kapcsan kiemelnem a lentibol: Gold ammo for silver is important part of game economy.
en innentol eselytelennek latom, h ertelmes megoldas szuletne a problemara, lasd a nagyszeru otletek... kivancsi lennek, hanyan toltenek sima ap helyett goldot 5-6k krediert, h gyorsabb legyen a lovedek, vagy tobb kritikus lojjon... esetleg opcio lehetne meg, h tobb lepattanot lehessen loni vele :P
"How about just decreasing the damage of prem. ammo by 50% .<snip>"
-No. Rebalancing prem ammo is okay tho. Things like 420 pen HEAT will have to go away.
Q's: Can Slava explain on this? It is a bit contradicting to read 'no' followed by 're-balancing prem ammo is okay'. What did he have in mind, what direction?
In which direction should we, us players, be thinking in regards to your vision on how this is could be rebalanced?Ó
-Reduction of dmg of premium ammo? I don’t like the idea of ruining premium ammo, that’s what these “let’s nerf gold dmg by 30-50%” questions are – some people ask us to take away gold ammo one way or another. Gold ammo for silver is important part of game economy.
So the idea is that premium ammo is a better ammo. Does better always mean more penetration? No, it doesn’t.
Options:
More pen or more dmg or faster speed or more crits or…there are many options.
For example, Su100Y already has different gold ammo – more dmg one. For some tanks we can go that way, why not?