#18
Tenyleg erdekes a hir talalasa, ugyanis az EU dontese valojaban teljesen masrol szol, legalabbis az Apple tekinteteben.
Kifogasukban elmarasztaljak ugyan az Apple-t azert, mert az iTunes-nak fenti cikkben is emlitett erdekes ertekesitesi gyakorlata van Europaban, viszont az igazi bunosnek a kiadokat hozza ki, mig az Apple-t konkretan aldozatnak allitja be, aki a kiadok akaratanak engedelmeskedett.
(Csak a felreertesek elkerulesenek erdekeben: ezt nem en mondom, hanem az EU-s kifogas.)
Nehany idezet az szovegbol ennek alatamasztasara:
"Our current view is that this is an arrangement which is imposed on Apple by the major record companies and we do not see a justification for it."
"The Statement of Objections does not allege that Apple is in a dominant market position and is not about Apple's use of its proprietary Digital Rights Management (DRM) to control usage rights for downloads from the iTunes on-line store,"
#18