-Nem alkalmazunk jelzős szerkezetet. Még arra se, akivel nagyon nem értesz egyet.
-Nem gyűlölködünk!
-HADITECHNIKAI TOPIC, aki nem tudja értelmezni, az megy máshova!
[Légi Harcászati / Légvédelmi FAQ]
-
Papichulo #67334 A szomorú igazság az, hogy egy Leo2-őt felülről és hátulról szerintem ma is átvinne egy ilyen puska.
Ha WW2 puskakra gondoltal, akkor nem igen...
"The cost of this versatility was heavy weight of the rifle (usually between 40 and 60 kg) and ammunition, extremely heavy recoil, high costs of the guns and ammunition. And in the end, the penetration of the 20mm anti-tank rifles still was about 30-35mm at its best. Considering the fact that by 1942 most tanks had armor thicker than that (Soviet T-34 had armor 45/45mm (front/side) thick, US M4 Sherman - 51/38mm, German TIII - 30-50mm and TIV - 80/30mm) by the 1942 most anti-tank rifles became ineffective against medium and heavy tanks of all sides of conflict."