-Nem alkalmazunk jelzős szerkezetet. Még arra se, akivel nagyon nem értesz egyet.
-Nem gyűlölködünk!
-HADITECHNIKAI TOPIC, aki nem tudja értelmezni, az megy máshova!
[Légi Harcászati / Légvédelmi FAQ]
-
zoltang #30887 Leopard 2A5
vs KE (mm)(1) - Turret: 850-930 Glacis:620 Lower front hull:620
vs CE (mm)(1) - Turret: 1730-1960 Glacis:750 Lower front hull:750
Ukrainian T-84 w/K-5 ERA
vs KE (mm)(1) - Turret: 850-1100 Glacis: 680-720
vs CE (mm)(1) - Turret: 1250-1600 Glacis: 960-1040
M1A2 SEP
vs KE (mm)(1) - Turret: 940-960 Glacis:560-590 Lower front hull:580-650
vs CE (mm)(1) - Turret: 1320-1620 Glacis:510-1050 Lower front hull:800-970
1. I have listed the best frontal armour equivalent, even the mighty M1A2SEP or T-90A will not have the same protection at all points on its frontal arc. Some points will be weaker, especially say the upper front turret or the gun mount. In many cases the measured LOS armour thickness will differ from the protection estimated above, often that is because of the incorporation of exotic compounds that offer better protection than an equivalent weight of RHA against some threats. For example, the LOS thickness of the glacis armour on the basic T-72 is about 550mm, but RHAe protection vs KE round is far less.
2. Protection levels for US MBT's are larger than usually quoted because the US standard is for a 30 degrees oblique shot. To return to US Army style measurements divide all figures on chart by 1.15. NII Stali estimate M1A1HA turret at 700mm versus KE, 850mm versus CE for a 30 degrees oblique shot. GSPO/BTVT estimates M1A1 at 480-500 versus KE and 790-840 versus CE, M1A1HA at 530-550 versus KE and 750-780 versus CE, M1A2 at 770 versus KE and 1000-1200 versus CE.
http://members.tripod.com/collinsj/protect.htm#1