Tehát túlzás azt állítani hogy nem kapható, vagy hogy jujj milyen drága.
3. "szánj rá potom 73 évet mire megtanulod vele hogy kell wepet krekkelni"
Mint előttem is írták: nem kell hozzá sok idő csak tudni kell olvasni angolul.
4. "és este pedig érkezik a RENDSZERGAZDA aki röhögve átírja a wepkulcsot"
Aha, csak ezt a kliensekben is meg kell tennie.
A kliens (fönök laptopja) meg otthon van. Rendszergazda meg ha félti az életét nem zavarja fel a főnököt minden este, csak hogy átállítsa a WEP kulcsot.
6. " és még MACszűrést is használ" "MAC filtering: This is like handing a security guard a pad of paper with a list of names. Then when someone comes up to the door and wants entry, the security guard looks at the person's name tag and compares it to his list of names and determines whether to open the door or not. Do you see a problem here? All someone needs to do is watch an authorized person go in and forge a name tag with that person's name. The comparison to a wireless LAN here is that the name tag is the MAC address. The MAC address is just a 12 digit long HEX number that can be viewed in clear text with a sniffer. A sniffer to a hacker is like a hammer to a carpenter except the sniffer is free. Once the MAC address is seen in the clear, it takes about 10 seconds to cut-paste a legitimate MAC address in to the wireless Ethernet adapter settings and the whole scheme is defeated. MAC filtering is absolutely worthless since it is one of the easiest schemes to attack. The shocking thing is that so many large organizations still waste the time to implement these things. The bottom line is, MAC filtering takes the most effort to manage with zero ROI (return on investment) in terms of security gain."
Forrás: The six dumbest ways to secure a wireless LAN
#25