Cat#23
a bíró indoklásában egyértelműen a RIAA vádjait visszhangozza, legalábbis nemtom mit keres egy végzésben ilyen szöveg:
"As file sharing has increased over the last four years, the sales of recorded music have dropped by approximately 30%. Perhaps other economic factors contributed, but the events likely are related. Music downloaded for free from the Internet is a close substitute for purchased music; many people are bound to keep the downloaded files without buying originals. That is exactly what Gonzalez did for at least 30 songs."
De az igazán röhejes, hogy a bíró a LEGALACSONYABB kiszabható összeget itélte meg:
"This section provides that the author’s entitlement, per infringed work, is “a sum of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court considers just. [...] What number between $750 and $30,000 is “just” recompense is a question for the jury, unless both sides agree to decision by the court. But BMG Music was content with $750 per song, which the district judge awarded on summary judgment."