codebase=\"http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=5,0,0,0\"
WIDTH=790 HEIGHT=343>
Elfelejtett, ellopott, elhagyott accountok visszaszerzése!
WIDTH=790 HEIGHT=343>
Elfelejtett, ellopott, elhagyott accountok visszaszerzése!
-
#63316
Guess i have to clear some things up.
1.) Silencer reduces recoil when spraying!
Wrong. The recoil patterns of both weapons are about the same as you can see in this screenshots:
silenced:
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/6387/s..
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3910/s..
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/415/si..
unsilenced:
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9599/u..
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9628/u..
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/7382/u..
2.) The ROF of the silenced M4A1 is slower!
Wrong. Both weapons require exactly 2.62 seconds to shoot all 30 bullets. (Tested on a 66-tick server. It took 173 ticks for both weapons to empty 30)
3.) Damage keeps the same!
Partly wrong, partly right.
1 shot to the head of an unarmored opponent at point blank range:
unsilenced M4A1: 131 damage
silenced M4A1: 131 damage
So nothing special. The damage keeps the same. But...
1 shot to the head of an unarmored opponent at 30 meters distance:
unsilenced M4A1: 122 damage
silenced M4A1: 116 damage
The damage of a silenced M4A1 is exactly 6 damage points lower!
By the way: The armor penetration of both weapons is exactly 70%.
4.) Accuracy keeps the same!
Wrong. For each weapon i shot 100 bullets at this wall:
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/1703/t..
Then i counted the bullets that hit the red target. Here are the results:
standing:
unsilenced M4A1: 61/100
silenced M4A1: 47/100
ducking:
unsilenced M4A1: 68/100
silenced M4A1: 52/100
So we learn:
-a unsilenced M4A1 is about 30% more accurate than a silenced one.
-ducking improves the accuracy about 11%
Képek már nem jönnek be, de a szöveg is ad pár támpontot a témában